Feeds:
Posts
Comments

 

Resourcer

I.T. Recruitment – it’s part sales, part counselling.  We’re trying to find possible career opportunities for a guy whose current role, he has just discovered, is being advertised behind his back.  After a great deal of private dicking (of the ratiocinatory kind) he has evidence to suggest that he is en route to being let go.

      He’s hurt, not least because it looks like half of his work colleagues are in on the conspiracy of silence.  ‘I’ve spent the last four weeks playing detective while having to play dumb,’ he said.  ‘I feel like Columbo.’  We warned him that after finally confessing to having covertly replaced him, his boss will probably pull a gun, and that, like Columbo, he should stay calm and wait for a disgruntled, invariably female secretary-with-a-secret-grudge to pull her own gun and shoot the boss just before the cops arrive.  He’ll thank us for that advice.

      I doubt my own boss would start interviewing people for my job behind my back.  But if it ever happened, I believe I would be magnanimous about it.  In fact, I’d like to take this opportunity to offer my best wishes to anybody reading this who also happens to be thinking about stealing my livelihood.  If you genuinely deserve my desk-space more than me, you should have it.  Fair’s fair.  In fact, to prove that my grapes aren’t sour, I’d like to offer you some ‘insider tips’ on how to wow my boss in a job interview.

1. For God’s sake, refer to yourself ONLY in the third person throughout the interview.  Our boss prefers that kind of cool detachment.  You may, however, gesture towards yourself while saying your (full) name.  But use both hands at least.

2.  Remember to shake hands as well as kissing/hugging – it’s old fashioned but it’s polite.  Incidentally, my boss developed her hand-shaking style in 70s Harlem.  Be creative, be funky.  Be gymnastic.

3. Studies have shown that smoothing one eyebrow continuously with a moistenened fingertip is almost as irresistible as using pheromone spray.

4.  Use pheromone spray – it worked for me.  I suggest the mail-order-only brand Seduct – only £2.99!  Per litre!  (That’s genuine musk-gland you can smell.)

5.  A heavily tattooed face screams ‘commitment’.

6.  Remember, you’re only a balaclava and a heavy-booted kick away from making an unforgettable entrance. 

7.  Be funny!  Interviews can be inhibitively stuffy affairs at times, but it’s nothing that you can’t alleviate with humour.  I’d recommend waggling your finger out of your fly while barking ‘You like?’ in a loud, gutteral, Mediterranean accent. If that doesn’t get my boss ‘ROFL’, as the kids say, then my name’s not a monkey’s uncle.

8.  On the subject of names, be sure to address my boss correctly.  She likes to be called Mama.

 

9. Sock puppet, baby voice.

10. Round here, wearing clothes is considered a little too… formal.  If you must dress, keep it basic.  A pelt is fine.

 

So now you know what I know.  It’s up to you what you do with it.  And don’t worry about me – I’ll get my reward in the next life for this exercise in large-heartedness. 

Enjoy my desk.  Don’t, whatever you do, open the bottom drawer.

 

 

 

 

Goodbye to spell-cheek

Grammar 

Haven’t written a post for days know, and have sort of been pudding it off.  Your thinking: he’s just lazy!  But your wrong.  The truth, I have discovered, is that I am just too much of a perfectionist - and it is slowing me down.

They’re.  I’ve sad it.

Since starting this blob I have tried to write the best English of which i am capable, punctuated properly.  I have been careful with my spelling and strict with my grandma, for one simple reason: this is a company blog and, as such, it is HTS’s calling-card.  But then I read to day, in Penelope Trunk’s brilliant blog The Brazen Careerist, that Writing without typos is totally outdated. You don’t have unlimited time, she writes in her thought-promoking, completely error-free post, so spend it on ideas, not hyphens. 

To me it was like being libated from prison.  The snales fell from my eyes.  I had been bland!  Now I could sea.  Ideas - not hypen’s.

It almost made me feel better about the fact that one reason i haven’t been blogging is that, as a resaucer / admnin monkey in a recruitment agency, i have been going through candidate’s cvs’ all day correctig misspellings of the world liaise, which is not spelt liase, lease or leayse.  What had i been getting so stressed about?  Sometimes it drived me so mad!  I would sit and tremble and a work colleague had to put a hand on my shoulder and calm me down.  ‘Their their,’ they would say.  ‘It’s only woods on a page.’  And they are right.

It’s only wood’s.  Just because on blogs wood’s is all we have, apart from picture’s and video’s and music that is, it doesn’t mean that we have to get so stressed about making them the RIGHT wood’s, or about using full stops sometimes you just have to let inspiration flow and trust you’re reader to make sense of how that or could it?  Well, could it? 

It could.  Or could it?

It reminds me of an incidental I am ashamed of now.  In the pub, having an augment with someone recently, with me winning the augment quite easily, my interloputer suddenly say’s: Why do you have to be so logical all the time?

I said to her: Grammatical be should why we time all the?

She said, What?

i thought it was a good answer at the time but now i feel ashamed, like i just said.

From now on, no more of this ‘anal’ approach to blogging for me.  In fact, I am going to stand on my desk right now and shout at the top of my lugs, NO MORE ANAL BLOGING FOR ME!  And no more cleaning up peoples’s CV’s as though i am some kind of fascist!  Let them leayise to there heat’s content, for all i care!!! 

Its’ only woods.

IDEA’S – NOT - HYPHEN’S. 

Your comment’s are most welcome!!!!!!!!

 

 

 

 

 

technology

They’re standing in a group, the teenagers outside my work-place, but there’s no communication between them. They’re all texting, frowning at their upheld mobile phones in stances that strike me as Shakespearean (Alas pr Yrk). Perhaps they are texting each other. I stare, composing a blog-post about them in my head, and one of them, thumbing a keypad with one hand while drinking coke cross-eyed through a straw, suddenly scents me and looks up. For a terrible moment I actually think: Wait – can she see my thoughts? Are they appearing on her screen? Can phones do that now?

I have not made the transition into our current age. It took me a long time to get used a phone vibrating on my person. I went through a long phase of experiencing phantom buzzing. Once a packet of fish fingers seemed to vibrate in my hand in the Frozen aisle in Sainsbury’s and I answered it. Back when I was a school mentor, sometimes the whole classroom would buzz, and not with enthusiasm: the kids could not leave their gadgets alone. They loved them. They stole each other’s stuff. Friends often stole from friends. It was a girl’s school. I noticed that if a girl stole another’s boyfriend, reconciliation was possible. If a girl stole another’s Samsung, things would get seriously Old Testament. (You’ve never seen a stoning until you’ve seen someone being pelted with twenty Motorola Pebls.)

Perhaps, like me, you are one of those people who finds it easy to grumble about kids today and their techno-materialism. Take this easy test: If you punctuate your text messages scrupulously and never abbreviate, you and I are soul-mates (or ‘slmts’, as the kids would put it). We are the kind of people who tell our kids they should get out more, and wish that other people’s kids got out less.

But these kids did not invent the gadgets that hypnotise them. They did not invent the Xbox. They do not sell themselves ringtones. My generation came up with lots of that stuff. Moreover, it is adults who profit from all the industries that seek to keep youths in a state of high excitement. Selling to kids is very big business; it pays to have children forever wanting more. And as someone who works in I.T., albeit tangentially (in recruitment), I am profiteering just like all the others.

I wish I had something better to hand on to the next generation. Any ideas?

This is a blog about ethical recruitment, so I’ll finish this post with a quick note about work. I’ve said before that those of us who choose to work hard for most of our lives deserve more than pay; we deserve for our careers to make us happy. Our time outside work shouldn’t feel like respite. We should be able to honestly promise our children that working hard at things they enjoy – or with people they like being around – will most likely bring them happiness as well as a living. Otherwise, the only incentive we can give to kids to work hard is that they’ll be able to buy more of the crap we tell them they need.

The thing is, I don’t think we can or should expect our bosses to hand out happiness. We need to look out for each other, somehow. We need to be the custodians of other people’s careers, trying to creating environments in which everyone’s talents get recognised, put to use and rewarded. We should help each other find the roles, the companies, and the colleagues we’re best suited to. Recruitment companies can help do this, obviously, by caring more about people than about immediate profits. That is what the ethical recruitment movement is about: how we can do this without going broke. But how can people outside recruitment transform the world of work? How can we make our employers look at us and think, ‘These people really want each other to be happy here’? ‘These people are trying to help each other succeed’?

Any ideas?

Feel free to comment. (Remember to pnctu8.)

 

Picture: toothpaste for dinner

Six Billion Duller Men*

 

Jigsaw
* and women.

Or: Jigsaw Theory 101.

There were two main fears I entertained when starting this blog over on Vox.  The first fear was that nobody would read it, and the second was that people would read it.  I like to think that every blogger has these fears.  Nobody wants to publish their thoughts and then sit around, with school disco despondency, waiting for comments that never arrive.  On the other hand, nobody wants to click the publish button and find themselves, within the hour, being burned in effigy in Youtube videos.

Any new blog finds itself competing for attention with billions of  other blogs.  It may not survive!  A new blog is created every second.   Swimming in the depths of the blog-ocean (Blocean?) are blogs fated to live and die unseen.  Common sense dictates that if you’re interested in winning web-traffic for your creation, you’ll have to strive to be more that bit more fascinating than untold numbers of people.  Essentially, you will be engaged in a struggle to make billions of people seem duller than you.

 

Folks like Dale Carnegie, of How to Win Friends and Influence People fame, encouraged us to think that we can and should make ourselves fairly universally likeable.  We can develop attributes that enable us to appeal (more or less) to anyone and everyone.  The cultural influence of Carnegie et al has been pervasive – many of us automatically equate social effectiveness with mastering one-size-fits-all social skills.  We assume that any two people can fit together, like building blocks, as long as they sandpaper down any interpersonal bumps that would otherwise prevent people from smoothly slotting side-by-side.

But what if people aren’t like building blocks?  What if people are like jigsaw pieces?

An individual jigsaw piece usually looks a mess.  There’s a bit of picture on it, but the picture doesn’t quite make sense without other pieces to add context.  It has a funny shape.  Some pieces have distinct bits of picture on them, some are just one colour, some look pretty ugly.  Each piece only fits with a limited number of other pieces – try to force two bits together against their will and you end up damaging both.  Jigsaw pieces are uncooperative and exclusive like that.  (But note that when the whole puzzle is solved, all the pieces will fit together in utopian harmony; but you can only solve the puzzle by first finding out that most pieces don’t fit together.)

If you want to make jigsaw pieces fit together, there are two ways to do it. 

One way is to paint every piece the same colour, trim off all those annoying sticky-out curvy bits, and insist that any piece should be able to fit next to any other piece. That’s the Dale Carnegie way.  Cut away those quirks! 

The other way is to make sure that you navigate each piece towards its proper neighbours, and put them where they belong.  The second way takes a lot longer, of course.

If people are like jigsaw pieces, then perhaps the purpose of blogging is not to reach the widest possible audience.  Maybe it is to display our idiosyncratic messiness, our shape, so that it’s easier for people to navigate towards us or away from us, provided they have internet access.

Perhaps we have onboard navigation systems that try to steer us towards people, situations, pastimes and careers with whom we fit.  Perhaps we’re designed in such a way that if we give up trying to fit where we don’t belong, and give up trying to co-exist with people and situations we can’t stand, we’ll shuffle to the right place eventually.  Maybe we should accept that we’re in the wrong place, believe that there’s a right place, and keep an eye out for road-signs. 

Perhaps there is something intrinsically powerful about refusing to disguise your paintwork and curves, so to speak, whether in conversations or on your CV.  True, some may think you weird.  But maybe the upside of not appearing vaguely attractive to everyone is that you appear irresistibly attractive to the right people.

If people are like jigsaw pieces, then the best way to deal with people you can’t stand is to stay the hell away from them as much as possible, and give up resenting them for driving you mad.  The madness you feel might just be the unseen hand of the jigsaw puzzler, trying to move you somewhere else.  (Perhaps your newfound easy tolerance will irritate your persecutor so much that he or she buggers off.)

If people are like jigsaw pieces, then we should never force ourselves to fit with people we know we don’t fit with.  Instead, we should take our mothers advice and be ourselves.  Whatever that means.  (I have no idea.)

If people are like jigsaw pieces, then it follows that nobody’s personality is a complete, self-contained picture, and nobody’s personality is ‘well rounded’.  There are no round jigsaw pieces.  Everyone’s personality is naturally messy and bumpy.  But if we don’t exhibit our native messiness to some extent then how will anyone know that they are supposed to fit next to us?

If people are like jigsaw pieces, what does this mean for our work-lives?  Do our careers mark out our position on the puzzle-board?  If our job feels all wrong, does that mean we’re miles off course?  Camping in the wrong woods?  How should we help our employers or potential employers see what kind of puzzle-piece we are?  Should we mention on our CVs that we enjoy juggling snakes?

How honest should a jigsaw piece be about his or her not-so-nice side?  Should one mention on one’s blog that one enjoys smelling strangers’ hair on buses?  How about on one’s resume?  (Personally I think that we should probably regard truly horrid aberrations as grime to clean off ourselves, rather than inwrought aspects of our personal uniqueness.  I could be wrong, though.)

So.  Are we building blocks or jigsaw pieces?

(Next week: what if we aren’t like building blocks or jigsaw pieces, but countries, islands and nation states?)

Epicurus 

 

VOX LINK: Click here to see what Vox bloggers have been saying about this post.

 

The post room of Ajacen Plc was the flabby stomach of Ajacen House, the place where hard work died and in its place a phoenix of idleness and loafing stirred in the ashes, peered up at you and yawned.  It was a semi-subterranean vault where little was done to better the fortunes of Ajacen (now defunct), a reseller of risk-management software located on an industrial estate on the outskirts of Silicon Valley, Berkshire.  The room was dominated by a centrally-placed wire-mesh construction, greyish yellow, housing 20 boxes, one for each letter of the alphabet (including the letters JK, PQ, UVW and XYZ); the bottom of the large window was flush with the pavement outside, so all you could see all day were the happy legs of the free, scissoring past.

    In one corner of the post room was a grey filing cabinet, crucial to a game Gary and I invented during my first week there, a game called Firing Squad, in which you placed an inverted polystyrene cup on top of the cabinet, attached to it a small blindfold made of black tape, then shot it from the other side of the room with elastic bands.  After a while we injected fresh thrills into the game by changing its name to Gangster Drug Bust.  On the other side of the room was a draughtsman’s desk, covered in paper-clipped bundles of invoices and notelets, coffee-rings, photocopied lists of internal telephone numbers.  Outside the door, in the corridor, was a machine that sold coffee (no tea), soups and hot chocolate that you had to stir yourself with whatever was handy, a pen, a bulldog clip, a stapler, a rolled-up envelope, or else you ended up with hot murk with a sea-bed.

    Our hours were nine till five-thirty, three pounds an hour, not too bad a wage considering that a day’s work entailed just three mail-drops and collections covering three office floors, some flinging of outgoing post into the yellow wire boxes, the loading of Royal Mail bags, a bit of franking, a bit of re-franking the post that had been franked wrong or had been cowering behind other post on its way through the franking machine, all made endurable by an unofficial hour-and-a-half lunch break in a local pub with an upstairs terrace, smoking comical conical roll-ups made with Gary’s liquorice papers, leaving us rested and drunk enough to face an afternoon of lugging around GPO bags, some trying to affix the zip-locks to the GPO bags before plonking them into red trolleys, an occasional stroll to the bank to deposit something important, a final winner-takes-all game of Gangster Drug Bust, later renamed Operation Hard Justice and involving a brief inquisition and some slow-motion leaping and shouting Freeze! and calling the cup a jive-ass honky, some riding up and down in the lifts collecting boxes from the lobby and occasionally helping people unload vans out front, some further riding up and down in the lifts standing behind executives spraying them surreptitiously with a pheromone spray called Seduct that Gary had ordered from a magazine: about an hour’s genuine work in all.

    When I first came to Ajacen, fresh from university, otherwise unemployable, I dressed to impress.  I arrived wearing the one tie I owned and my pair of black school trousers, and Gary, whose shirt was never tucked in and sometimes had hot chocolate on it, didn’t pass judgement.  But soon he began to think it funny to back away from me after every conversational exchange, bowing, on account of my being smartly turned-out.  He took to fanning me with a ring-binder like a punkah-wallah and calling me massah and asking me if I cared for some watermelon.  I had assumed that in today’s modern office, people in lower wage brackets didn’t necessarily have to mark themselves out with food-stains, but Gary made me feel ridiculous so I abandoned the tie without dispute.  Within two weeks I was arriving at work up to hour late, wearing shirts plucked off my bedroom floor that morning, shirts that looked like origami, and there were no ill consequences, so I carried on dressing that way and eventually became proud of my gypsy-like appearance.

   I could see why Gary thought the job of post-room worker incommensurate with dressing like an executive: unlike executives, we had nothing much to do.  There wasn’t enough for Gary to do, so it was a mystery to us both why Ajacen hired someone to help him do it.  Apparently our superiors thought that the job involved much more than it did.  Once, as an experiment, Gary pretended to Chris, the post officer, that he and I were too exhausted to go on.  ‘We’re stretched beyond our mortal limits down here,’ he said.  ‘I don’t know what’s been going on in the world of post these last few days, but Nick and I are going under.’

    ‘Well, I had no idea!’ said Chris, horrified.

    ‘We might need an extra temp with us for a few days,’ I gasped, wiping my brow, playing along.  ‘Who could authorise that?’

    ‘Well, I might just go and authorise it myself,’ Chris said fiercely.  ‘You workers are my responsibility.’

    ‘You tell ‘em, boss,’ said Gary, slapping Chris’ arm.  ‘Let’s show those fat-cat bureaucrats up at City Hall that they can’t call all the shots.’

    Chris looked confused, but he humoured Gary and said, ‘Well, exactly!’  And the very next day a new temp appeared, a chubby guy named Andy.  The three of us pushed one red trolley containing four envelopes around the building, our shirts untucked, stopping occasionally for a rest, complaining in loud regional accents about the excess of work and our aching backs, other employees avoiding eye-contact, and every so often we’d look at the four envelopes shuffling in the trolley cage and the madness of the situation would hit the three of us at once, and we would laugh so hard we had to lean against a wall, crying.  The same thing happened later, back in the post room, after we’d stood around for almost two and a half hours playing a game with a tea bag and an empty tin box in which you had to get the tea bag in the box by flinging it against the ceiling.  We became hysterical and got stomach cramps.  It was the kind of fun I had expected to find at university but hadn’t.  I had never imagined that the most enjoyable thing you could do at my age was nothing, and that the best place to do it was in front of an old Pitney Bowes franking machine.  Meanwhile my plans of discovering a purpose in life sat dawdling in my mind, as idle as the rest of me.

 

* * *

 

We moderns use the term epicure (or epicurean) to describe someone with a Bacchic love of fine food and wine.  But as any philosophy student will tell you, the Greek philosopher Epicurus was no hedonist.  He thought that the purpose of life was not wanton indulgence but happiness – or, rather, aponia, or freedom from worry, and ataraxia, tranquillity.  For Epicurus, simplification was key.  A tranquil life is an uncomplicated life.  That meant, for Epicurus, no spouse, no kids, no great ambitions, no great financial commitments, and doing something pleasant and untaxing for a living (if you have to do anything at all, that is.  Epicurus ran a commune/school in his garden.)

    Apart from simplicity, the key to happiness for Epicurus lay in friendship.  Surround yourself with people with whom you get along.  Make yourself easy to get along with.  If you can spend all your time amongst friends, who cares what work activities you’re engaged in?

    Back at Ajacen I was an epicurean.  Work was somewhere I went to have fun.  The work itself, what little work there was, was tedious, and the financial rewards were wretched.  But I remember my time at Ajacen as an unalloyed joy.  I shared a house at the time, had no car, lived on pasta, and I was happy in a way that I could not afford to be happy now.

    It is true that I had no work ethic whatsoever.  But that isn’t necessarily a bad thing.  For every exciting job out there, you’ll find fifty jobs that are as dull as dogmeat but which need doing nonetheless.  Easy jobs that leave ample time for lofty conversations and games of Firing Squad.  Why let all the school dropouts snag these vacancies?  As long as the people with exciting jobs need post, the world will need post-room clerks. 

    Generally speaking, the epicurean path to career happiness is to view the people you work with as more important than your work.  Epicurean job-hunters seek out work that doesn’t raise their blood-pressure, where they get to be around people who are fun, and if that means maintaining simple, perhaps even frugal lifestyles, then so be it. It also means being trying to be really easy to get along with, and doing your bit to make work a nice place to be, which is impossible as long as you view your co-workers as rivals or obstacles rather than (at least potential) friends.

    Obviously a completely stress-free epicurean career is easier if you’re single and mortgage-free, so it’s not for everyone.  But many people contemplating changing careers should consider jabbing their job-search with the epicurean trident:

 

Prong one: Make an effort to simplify your lifestyle, even a little.  That way you’re free to take a pay-drop to secure a job you love.

Prong two: Make it a career priority to work with people you like.  Working with people you hate is a kind of slow death.  Look for companies staffed – and run by – people you click with.  Research the senior staff online (increasingly easy to do in these days of company blogs) – you’ll be amazed how many potential bosses you can find who share your love of hang-gliding, horse-whispering or Viking reconstructionism.  That’s the person you should approach, CV/Viking drinking-horn in hand.

Prong three: Think twice about killing yourself for the sake of career progression.  It’s well-known that people in an organisation rise to their level of incompetence.  But we also tend to rise above our stress-threshold.  If a big fat heart attack is waiting for you at the top of the career ladder, stop climbing.  Switch ladders if necessary.  Epicurus died at the age of 72, a good innings in the 3rd century BC.

 

Personally, I would love to see a recruitment agency that specialises in putting happy, underachieving modern epicureans into menial jobs.  I would start the agency myself, but it sounds like hard work.

   

Any thoughts on the merits / demerits of the epicurean approach to work?  Are you, or have you ever been, an epicurean?  Or do you thrive on stress?  Comments most welcome.

 

 

 

 

I have a Blogdream

I have a dream.  It seems to me that this epoch-making statement, immortalised by Abba (and some civil rights guy), applies to fewer of us than you might think, especially when it comes to careers.  I really don’t know that many people who feel they are following a calling.  Most of us don’t have the jobs we told our school career advisors we wanted – and, moreover, we act as though we don’t really want those jobs any more.  We’ve grown up; we’re realists now.  Expecting one’s daily toil to be meaningful and fun is a piece of childhood naivety.

This disparity between childhood aspiration and adult reality is not necessarily a bad thing.  When I was a child, all the boys I knew wanted to be astronauts or soldiers, and all the girls wanted to be nurses.  Picture a world full of soldiers fighting nurses while everyone else is in space, looking down in horror, and you’ll appreciate that sober realism has its plusses.

Incidentally, I told my career guidance counsellor I wanted to be a Bodhissatva.  That is, I wanted to selflessly defer my entrance to nirvana until all sentient beings had been liberated from the endless cycle of death and rebirth.  (Perhaps you went through the same phase.)  My counsellor, a canny woman, told me that ‘all sentient beings’ would probably prefer me to vanish into nirvana as soon as possible, where I wouldn’t require them to fund my wiggy new-age lifestyle with their taxes.

Of course, some children who say they want to be astronauts do end up being astronauts.  For all I know, some children who say they want to be bank proof operators end up being astronauts.  But listen, all of us who bother to get up and work every day to pay taxes to maintain the army of Neighbours-watching dole-scrounging would-be Boddhisatvas deserve more than just a pay cheque (or BACS payment) for our toils.  We deserve a big slab of happiness, delivered daily, with a side order of fun and some dips of meaningfulness and maybe an After Eight before we go home to watch Neighbours, which we’ve videoed.

That is why I, the most junior member of HTS , a boutique (read: small) IT recruitment company , decided to hoodwink talk my boss into letting me be the company blogger.  I did it because I wanted to open up a forum in which people – especially people in recruitment – could discuss how we can make life better for those of us who work hard most days of our lives.  And because I wanted to be able to say to people that I am a blogger, rather than an admin clerk.

So you are witnessing the realisation of a small dream.  I am aware that when I tell people I’m a blogger, they will assume that I mean I am unemployed.  But so what?  The child I once was, had he known what ‘blogging’ meant, would have dropped that stupid Bodhissatva aspiration like a hot rock and cried, ‘That’s what I want to do!’

Of course, if I’d known about blogging in 1985, I could theoretically have invented the internet myself.  And you, my friend, would be living in a very different world.

It may not be feasible for you and me to undo years of ‘realism’ overnight and decide to follow our childhood dreams.  That path may leave us unemployed and living on the streets eating mice.  But we can surely make what we’re doing now a little dreamier, can we not?